WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners. By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles. Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime. |
Nola fires 4How America's teacher shortage is leading uncertified educators into classroomsKyle Larson off to wet and rocky start in quest to complete Indy 500 and NASCAR doubleAlanna Smith scores careerTexas university leaders say hundreds of positions, programs cut to comply with DEI banChina to initiate issuance of ultraPenny Hardaway's son Ashton transfers from Memphis to Saint Mary'sSánchez drives in the winning run in the 10th inning as the Marlins beat the Tigers 1Meet the IT whizz who beat Prince Harry: Computer programmer created Agatha ChristieGiancarlo Stanton's HR, Carlos Rodón's 6